Concepts, Problems, & Opportunities for use of Annihilation Energy:
An Annotated Briefing on Near-Term RDT&E to Assess Feasibility
RAND Note N-2302-AF/RC
B. W. Augenstein
The following two charts list some of the RDT&E study and experiment issues associated with production of antimatter and theassociated product cost. Many of these are already partially treated inthe appended references, but each item listed warrants much furtherconsideration.
For example, the CERN target has a nominal energy deposition limitof ~ 185-200 J/gm, at which point the temperature rise is greater than ~103 C and shock waves begin to form which can fracture the target. This limit corresponds to a beam of ~ 2x1013 P/mm2; still higher depositionswill cause target material depletion and reduction of antiprotonproduction. Even for a l = 10-3 , a proton beam flux of - 2x1017 P/secis needed to achieve a production level of 10 milligrams of antimatterper year. Many solutions can be proposed (and some have beenconsidered) to heating, stress, etc. problems caused by such intensebeams. One possibility, for example, is to form a number of beamletsand at the same time move each beamlet relative to its associated targetat rates significantly greater than the target shock velocity of ~ 0.3mm/µsec. In turn, one option for this relative motion is to move thetarget against a fixed proton beam (to circumvent the problems of havingthe antiproton collection system track the motion of the proton beam inthe case where the target is fixed). The design challenge is then tomove targets at velocities of perhaps ~ 1.0 mm/µsec relative to thefixed beam, continuously. Conceptual schemes for this exist.
In a similar way, each item in the following two charts can beenlarged upon. The important point to emphasize, then, is that well-defined approaches can be formulated to resolve the uncertainties whichcurrently abound in the RDT&E issues posed by antimatter production andcollection.
For high energy physics, needs to reaccelerate accumulated antiprotonsto very great energies focuses attention on high quality beams. Maximizingantiproton production may modify or give different emphasis to processbounds.
HTML Expression only © 1997, W. Paul Blase