Concepts, Problems, & Opportunities for use of Annihilation Energy:
An Annotated Briefing on Near-Term RDT&E to Assess Feasibility
RAND Note N-2302-AF/RC
B. W. Augenstein
| For a range of l values: | l=10-4 | 10-3 | 10-2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proton beam flux (P/sec) | ~2x1018 | ~2x1017 | ~2x1016 |
| Proton beam current, milliamps: | ~320 | 32 | 3.2 |
| Proton beam power, gigawatts: (select P energy ~65 GeV) | 20 | 2 | 0.2 |
| Required input power (eff. ~½), gigawatts: | 40 | 4 | 0.4 |
In this chart we take the l values just suggested and compute thebasic power amounts invested to achieve a given amount of antinucleonproduction (in the example we use a production level of 10milligrams/year). We assume a dedicated facility, continuouslyproducing.
Some ways of recovering/savng the power needs shown, possibly upto the case where complete self-powering is achievable, can besuggested. These ways involve the energy production possible inmultiplying materials such as uranium (see slide 10). However, it isalso pointed out that there are precedents for large facilities relyingon large amounts of external power.
Power savings will generally require somehow using the proton beamwhich exits from the antiproton production target. That target willgenerally operate as a transmission target, so that the exiting protonbeam is a sizeable fraction of the incoming proton beam. Seriousattention to recovery/self-powering options requires more quantitativeinformation on the spectral properties of the exiting proton beam toobtain adequate details on the problems of utilizing this exitingparticle stream.
HTML Expression only © 1997, W. Paul Blase